Fair Valuations: Why Enhanced Analysis and Reporting Are Essential for Level 3 Assets

In investment management, accurate asset valuation is crucial—not just for internal performance tracking but also for maintaining investor trust and complying with regulations. Recent enforcement actions, such as the one involving Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust (MIMBT), underscore the importance of properly valuing Level 3 assets, which are notoriously difficult to price. Inaccurate valuations can be costly, not just in terms of penalties, but also in the damage they can inflict on a firm's reputation.
What Are Level 3 Assets?
Level 3 assets are investments that lack observable market prices, making them more difficult to value than Level 1 and Level 2 assets. These include highly illiquid securities such as certain mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), and private equity investments. Since these assets cannot be easily traded or measured using standard market data, their valuation relies heavily on internal models, estimates, and third-party pricing vendors.
The Importance of Enhanced Analysis for Level 3 Valuations
The MIMBT case highlights the risks associated with relying on standard or 'round lot' pricing for Level 3 assets, which are often thinly traded or sold in smaller, 'odd lot' sizes. Throughout the relevant period, MIMBT used round lot prices provided by a third-party vendor to value odd lot positions of CMOs, leading to significant overvaluation of these assets. The firm failed to adjust these prices to reflect the actual market conditions for odd lot trades, despite knowing that odd lot positions traded at a significant discount.
For advisers managing Level 3 assets, it's essential to:
· Use tailored valuation models : Instead of relying solely on vendor-provided prices, develop models that reflect the asset's actual liquidity and market conditions.
- · Conduct regular pricing reviews : Implement procedures to ensure that asset prices are continually validated, especially when market conditions change, or the assets are illiquid.
- · Consult multiple sources : When pricing is ambiguous, use broker quotes or conduct fair value determinations through pricing committees to cross-check valuations.
Reporting Transparency and Compliance
Valuation errors can lead to misleading reports, inflated performance figures, and even violations of federal securities laws. In the MIMBT case, the firm's mispricing of CMOs not only overstated the net asset values (NAVs) of their funds but also resulted in inaccurate investor communications. These errors contributed to conflicts of interest in trades and affected the overall performance reported to investors.
To prevent such issues, advisers should:
· Disclose valuation methods : Clearly communicate how valuations are determined, especially for hard-to-value assets, and any assumptions made in the process.
- · Monitor compliance policies : Implement strong internal controls and ensure compliance policies are followed, particularly when determining fair value for illiquid assets.
The High Cost of Fair Valuation Errors
Errors in the fair valuation of Level 3 assets can be financially and reputationally damaging. In the case of MIMBT, the firm was fined over $70 million in civil penalties, along with an additional $9.8 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. This case underscores how valuation missteps can lead to significant costs—not only in penalties but regulatory scrutiny and investor distrust.
Investment advisers must treat the valuation of Level 3 assets with the care and transparency they deserve. Enhanced analysis, robust reporting, and clear compliance procedures are essential to avoiding costly errors and maintaining the integrity of asset management operations.
Conclusion
There is no room for shortcuts for investment advisers handling Level 3 assets. Robust valuation processes are critical not only for accurate performance reporting but also for regulatory compliance. Considering recent enforcement actions, advisers must ensure that they provide accurate valuations supported by enhanced analysis and transparent reporting.
To safeguard your firm, ensure that your valuation processes for illiquid assets are thorough, regularly reviewed, and compliant with regulatory standards. Errors in these areas can be costly—not just in fines, but in your investors' trust in you.
If you need guidance on implementing fair valuation practices or ensuring your compliance with SEC regulations, consult with legal professionals experienced in investment management, such as FinTech Law.